Comparison
Dialpad vs OpenPhone
Side-by-side comparison for ABA agencies evaluating Dialpad and OpenPhone.
TL;DR
Dialpad and OpenPhone both target the gap between OpenPhone-class small-team simplicity and RingCentral-class enterprise complexity, but they emphasize different priorities. Dialpad leads on AI features (transcription, summaries, sentiment) and slightly more enterprise feature breadth. OpenPhone leads on price and small-team simplicity. For mid-size agencies that benefit from AI call documentation, Dialpad. For solo BCBAs and small clinics, OpenPhone.
When to pick Dialpad
Pick Dialpad when AI-assisted call documentation provides real value. Real-time call transcription, post-call summaries, and sentiment analysis save meaningful time for clinical supervisors reviewing communications and compliance teams auditing calls. For agencies with high call volume, those AI features can pay for themselves in saved review time.
Dialpad also offers more enterprise feature depth than OpenPhone — better admin controls, deeper integrations, more sophisticated call-flow configuration. For mid-size agencies that have outgrown OpenPhone but do not need RingCentral, Dialpad fits the gap.
When to pick OpenPhone
Pick OpenPhone when small-team simplicity and price matter most. The setup time is genuinely faster, the apps are best-in-class for everyday calling and texting, and the pricing is meaningfully lower than Dialpad at comparable team sizes.
For solo BCBAs and small clinics that simply need a working business phone line, OpenPhone is the right choice. Most small agencies do not need AI call summaries — they need a number that works and an app staff actually use.
Where they overlap
Both are HIPAA-eligible business phone systems with modern UX. Both gate HIPAA support to higher plan tiers. Both target the small-to-mid agency market. Both have public pricing with self-serve sign-up.
Pricing
OpenPhone Starter at $19/user/month is meaningfully cheaper than Dialpad Standard at $23/user/month, and the gap widens at HIPAA-eligible tiers. Dialpad's premium pays for AI features and broader enterprise capability. For agencies that will not use the AI features, OpenPhone is the better economic choice.
How GoodABA fits alongside either
Phone infrastructure is outside GoodABA's scope. Whether you pick Dialpad or OpenPhone, GoodABA fills the operations layer no phone system covers — branded family portal, intake forms, e-signed consents, client record, and communications log linked to clients.
Capability matrix
Dialpad vs OpenPhone — what each tool covers
| Capability | Dialpad | OpenPhone | GoodABA Ours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Dialpad, Inc. | OpenPhone Technologies, Inc. | GoodABA |
| Primary category | phone-systems | phone-systems | agency operations layer |
| Pricing | from USD23 | from USD19 | $99/mo Pro · 14-day trial |
| Clinical data collection | Not in this tool | Not in this tool | Not in this tool |
| Billing & RCM | Not in this tool | Not in this tool | Not in this tool |
| Scheduling | Not in this tool | Not in this tool | Not in this tool |
| Intake forms | Not in this tool | Not in this tool | Yes |
| Parent / family portal | Not in this tool | Not in this tool | Yes |
| Document e-signature | Not in this tool | Not in this tool | Yes |
| Insurance verification | Not in this tool | Not in this tool | Not in this tool |
| HIPAA-eligible (BAA) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Capabilities pulled directly from each vendor’s published profile. Confirm with the vendor before signing.
Related comparisons
Other comparisons featuring Dialpad or OpenPhone
Or explore each tool
Ready when you are
Trade the chaos for clarity.
10 minutes to set up. 14 days free to try. 30 days money-back once you’re in.
No card to start · Cancel anytime · HIPAA compliant